Every time a biopic of a famous person is made, it is
usually met with negative reviews or harsh criticism. Recent example: “The Iron Lady”, based on the life of Margaret Thatcher starring Meryl Streep. Though the movie won Streep her third Oscar deservingly, the reviews were not too positive. How much can a 2-hour movie say about such an icon and her accomplishments... or failures? It can never say enough. Similarly, I can imagine how difficult it must be to make a movie about someone like Aung San Suu Kyi’s magnitude who has led such
an extraordinary life filled with both triumphs and tragedies.
Honestly, I have never been this excited about any movie.
Any Burmese would say the same thing because finally there is a movie about us
and this incredible woman we consider as our second mother. The reviews I had read
before seeing the movie were scathing but it did not matter to me at all. Critics
being critics plus it possibly cannot be that bad considering the man behind
the film is Luc Besson whose film “The Fifth Element” is one of my all-time
favorite movies.
Touted as a love story rather than a life story, Luc Besson’s
“The Lady” shines spotlight on Aung San Su Kyi, Burma’s democracy icon and her
scholar husband, Michael Aris’s ill-fated love story. While I appreciate Besson’s
effort and respect him immensely for having guts to do the impossible which is
making the movie about Burma outside of Burma, “The Lady” has its flaws.
The script is either too ambitious or rather aimless. It
fails to tell the story of Aung San Su Kyi’s personal sacrifices and her struggles to bring
democracy to her beloved country without being clichéd and uninspiring. It also
seems that the theme of the movie could not be decided therefore it ends up being
a little bit of everything; a short history of Burma, her father’s assassination,
her family life in Oxford, the 1988 riot of Burma, the oppressive nature of the
ruling military junta, her accidental rise to the leadership, her tireless campaigning
all over Burma, Michael Aris’s efforts to aid his wife’s political agenda and
subsequently his death from cancer during their separation. If this project was
done as a miniseries like “Mildred Pierce” (2011) starring Kate Winslet, it
would have been able to give enough room for these many events to fully
materialize. As a 2-hour plus movie, it is tiring, stiff and it feels as if these
important facts about her life were being read out speedily rather than presented
tastefully as a movie.
There are many unnecessarily repeated scenes such as the numerous
visits made by her sons and husband from London or her speeches shot on
different locations but saying more or less the same thing. The dialogues
between the characters, especially of the evil army generals are clumsy and
corny. A golfing general ordering one of his soldiers to clear off the field by
firing a gun at the two dogs that are getting in the way is also laughable. And
it cheapens the actual brutality of the Burmese military junta and their human
rights abuses throughout the country for decades. The train wreck script
comes to an abrupt end with the scene in which the monks leading the saffron revolution
come to her house to pay respect and she emerges from her gate to greet the
monks.
The depiction of Yangon and her residence is quite accurate
and convincing. David Thewlis’s Michael Aris is supportive, understanding and
gentle to Yeoh’s stubborn, determined and courageous Su. Michelle Yeoh has the
tremendous pressure playing a challenging role which is absolutely out of her
comfort zone. While she has no problem pulling off a British accent, her
Burmese makes me chuckle. But at least she tries and knowing my own language
and its complexity, my hat is off to her. The phone conversations between Aris
and Su during their separation are touching though the stereotypical dialogues could
be improved. Physically, Yeoh’s embodiment
of the Nobel Peace Prize winner’s grace and gentle manners is a success, particularly
during the scenes of Su’s hunger strike but emotionally her portrayal does not
quite get there, leaving me unmoved at times. To cast actors and extras who not only
speak Burmese but also can act outside of Burma must be an arduous task. Therefore
the secondary actors, including the two kid actors who play her sons and the Generals,
obviously amateur actors, are the weakest link of the film. Their performances
while minimal yet equally important fail to take the movie to where it should
have been. The two hour plus movie is way too long and tedious with its ingredients
not blending well.
“The Lady” is a thoughtful tribute to Aung San Su Kyi, our
national heroine. I am truly grateful that the ongoing struggle of Burma’s
democracy is eventually well-documented and presented to the world. As much as
I applaud the good deed and noble intention I just wish I could do the same for
the movie.




No comments:
Post a Comment