With an exception
of “Room” and “Brooklyn”, all nominated movies this year are either
big-budgeted blockbusters or star-studded spectacles with themes, tried &
true. We have the Hollywood epics such as the futuristic “Mad Max; Fury Road”
and the Cold War spy drama, “Bridges of Spies”. The quintessentially American,
“The Big Short” and “The Spotlight”. Of course, the tales of survival under
extreme circumstances; “Revenant” and
“The Martian”
Wait! Something is
missing. What is it? A Black movie. Yes, a movie about Black people. Because it
has become a norm, a tradition in the last ten years to nominate, if not award,
at least one movie about Black people in America. Movies like “Precious”, “The
Help”, “Beast of the Southern Wild”, “12 Years a Slave” and “Selma” have made
the prestigious list of being one of the best.
What happened this
year then? When the nominations were
announced in January, there was an outcry over the lack of diversity in the
main categories. Some said, “This is by far the Whitest Oscars in recent memory”.
Some claimed, “It’s racist to not nominate Black actors”. Some simply called
for the boycott. In the United States, I
believe, when people say ‘diversity’, it immediately almost always means ‘Black
people’. “Diversity” stands for many different types of people and things – I
don’t see Asians and Arabs in the nominations too. What about the Latinos apart
from the Mexican who made “Revenant”? At least many Black people have been
nominated and won the Oscars in the past. Sidney Poitier won Best Actor in
1964, so did Halle Berry in 2002. Denzel Washington has two Oscars. Jamie Foxx,
Whoopi Goldberg, Cuba Gooding Jr., Octavia Spencer…the list goes on.
By the look of it, it is indeed Caucasian-heavy in the main categories. However, I don’t think it has anything to do with the race issue. It just might be the year where no particular movie with black people is particularly Oscar-worthy. That is all.
Amongst the movies vying for for Best Picture, I thoroughly enjoyed “Mad Max: Fury Road”. Usually not my kind of movie yet it won me with its quirky storyline and bad-ass cast. The CGI-driven flick may find better luck in the technical Oscar categories. The Wall Street and The Newsroom type of movies are also not my kind and not everyone’s cup of tea. Considering their niche audience, I doubt that either “The Spotlight” or “The Big Short” has the power to draw the unanimous vote to win the gold. If it were up to me, I choose “Brooklyn” as this year’s best. It’s got a touch of history, romance and wardrobe from the past, in between carefully paced laughs and sobs. This tale of an Irish Immigrant, set in New York in the 50’s, may be a tad too melancholy at first glance but it’s bouncy script and snappy performances, including that of Saoirse Ronan in the leading role, make it a well-deserved Best Picture nominee.
That being said, this might just be the year where back-to-back wins for Best
Picture as well as Best Director are a possibility. Last year’s triple winner,
Alejandro Iñárritu is back with a bang, louder than ever, with
the much-bellyhooed “Revenant”. Movie goers are treated to a journey into the
wild beyond their wildest imaginations, a jouney that they will not likely repeat (I
was emotionally drained once the film was over) but a journey that will be
remembered. “Revenant” is one of those Hollywood epics that will go down in
history, like “Ben Hur”, “Titanic” or “Avator” for its revolutionary movie
making. Iñárritu’s ambition and execution should be rewarded.
Let’s look at the
actor race next. A well-respected actor in his prime, on his sixth nomination,
Di Caprio will finally win his Oscar this year, not because it’s his career
best but it’s long overdue. Call it a mini premature lifetime achievement even.
In “Revenant”, he’s cold, he’s angry, he’s scared and he wants revenge but the
role doesn’t provide enough material or moments to exercise his acting muscles.
Let’s get real. We have seen him act better. On the other hand, Eddie
Redmayne’s portrayal of a historic transgender woman in “The Danish Girl”
further proves that last year’s Best Actor winner, is remarkably versatile,
capable of undertaking challenging roles. If Redmayne in “The Danish Girl” were
a vocal performance, it would be that of Mariah Carey- complex, emotive and certainly
robust. But him winning over Leo would have been too big of an Oscar upset.
Plus, Redmayne won’t be Tom Hanks enough to pull a back to back.
Brie Larson in "Room" |
In the actress
category, we have Charlotte Rampling and her very little known movie “45 Years”.
Honestly, she doesn’t stand a chance. Who are we fooling here? Cate Blanchett, in
her showboat-acting best, is more theatrical than cinematic in “Carol” – not
her best but always a thrill. Next, Saoirse Ronan, her second nomination for
“Brooklyn” but this time in leading category, is one of the most promising
young actresses of today. She’s got the look, the charm and the chops. Hence,
she can wait. She will certainly be here again in the very near future. Voters
will pass her over without mercy. Now, Jennifer Lawrence, overly awarded maybe,
is captivating, bringing the usual A game as Joy Mangno, a real-life American
dream, in David O’Russell’s overlooked gem, “Joy”. Lawrence wins Best Actress
in my book. But comes this Sunday, the front-runner and breakout star, Brie
Larson will go home with a gold for her gritty turn in “Room”. Larson is this
year’s Hilary Swank. She’s just added a BAFTA to her ever-expanding awards
cupboard. The Oscar is inevitable. For me, her performance is raw but a bit
short. Her co-star, an 8-year old, Jacob Tremblay should have been nominated
for the Best Supporting Actor.
Vikander and Redmayne in "The Danish Girl" |
Supporting
categories are also known as a-star-is-born category and now-or-never category.
Let me explain. It’s a lot less rigid in the supporting categories. Many surprise
wins have been pulled over the years. In some years, it doesn’t even matter who
the most deserving nominee really is. Who is the breakout star that Hollywood
wants to see more of? Now that’s important. For example, Lupita Nyong’o won
this award two years ago (Over Jennifer Lawrence in “American Hustle”, a role
that showcases more depth and range in terms of acting) – there you go. A-star-is-born
moment for Lupita. Not to discredit her but c’mon! Meryl Streep, Jennifer
Hudson, Anne Hathaway, Anna Paquin, Penelope Cruz , Marisa Tomei, to name a
few, also won this award in their youth and became bigger stars later on.
So this year’s IT girl is Alicia Vikander. Although she plays the lead role,
and what a weighty role that is, alongside Redmayne in “The Danish Girl”, the
studio put her in the supporting category, possibly for a better chance of
winning. Her only competition comes from Kate Winslet in “Steve Jobs”. Always
incredible Winslet has just picked up the BAFTA but have no fear, Alicia, it’s
the Brits doing the Brit thing to a Brit, Americans will adore you here. The
Oscar is yours.
So… what is
now-or-never? Remember, Alan Arkin won Best Supporting Actor for “Little Miss
Sunshine” over a heavy favorite that year, Eddie Murphy for “Dreamgirls”, Murphy’s
career best acting work? Arkin is a brilliant actor with solid body of work
throughout his long career. And he was controversially awarded that year. It
was his time to win or never. Who have we got this year for Best Supporting
Actor? Academy voters and fans alike, including me would love to see Mark
Ruffalo win for his astonishing work in “Spotlight” but the award is reserved for
Sylvester Stallone in “Creed”. And Stallone’s performance in the latest Rocky
franchise is sparkly enough to match the Oscar gold. Everyone loves a comeback,
a happily ever after, a beloved aging star getting his due, that
standing-ovation moment that lasts forever. It’s Hollywood after all.